I had a wake up call last week that
I would like to share. And I need to thank Martha Rogers and Lori Vanden Bosch
for providing it.
Because I majored in English in
university and have written novels, plays, articles, and songs for over thirty
years, I thought I had a fairly good feel for sentence structure. What a
surprise I received when Martha kindly looked over my most recent manuscript
and pointed out a grammatical error I consistently made throughout the book.
Lori, my editor, confirmed the error, and I had to do some fast editing to
correct it.
The error involved participial phrases (or “ing” sentences
as Martha describes them). For example, Tiptoeing
down the hallway, she went into the bedroom. In my mind this sentence
showed a transition from one place to another. First she tiptoed down the
hallway and then she went into the bedroom.
Martha accurately pointed out
that the sentence is chronologically impossible. You can’t tiptoe down the
hallway and, at the same time, go into the bedroom. A simple fix would be to
rewrite the sentence: She tiptoed down
the hallway and went into the bedroom.
Lori sent me an article entitled “Participial
Phrase Abuse.” I swallowed hard when I realized just how I was abusing participial phrases. The article stated:
“Participial phrases lend
themselves to a host of grammatical ills, including dangling participles and
chronological impossibilities. The most common problem associated with
participial phrases is the dangling participle. Swimming in the ocean, the cool water refreshed him. The sentence,
as written, tells us that the water is swimming in the ocean. Let’s fix it. Swimming the ocean, he felt refreshed.
“Chronological impossibilities
are also common. Consider the following sentence: Walking down the hallway, he stopped to tie his shoe. Someone
cannot walk down the hallway and stop to tie his shoe simultaneously, so this
sentence needs revision. A possible fix: Walking
down the hallway, he noticed his shoe was untied and stopped to tie it.
“When you come across one of
these phrases, ask yourself two key questions: (1) Does the action expressed in
the participle link up with the main clause correctly? And (2) Can these two
things happen simultaneously?”
Well, that’s the grammar lesson
for today. A giant thanks to Martha and Lori. I am a schoolteacher by
profession, but in this area I am clearly the student—a student who had to hit
the books and brush up on basic sentence structure. What did I learn? I need to
be on the watch for those tricky participial phrases continually. I need to use
them with care and use them sparingly. And, most of all, I need to review the
basics regularly.
Perhaps we all do.
2 comments:
Darrel, we always watch for things like that in the critique group that meets in my home.
And interestingly enough, a discussion of this very thing just took place on the ACFW main loop this week.
Thanks, Darrel. I'm so glad you considered our critique a learning experience. As old as I am, I hope I never stop learning and will be as open about accepting criticisms as you have been.
Post a Comment