In his post this week, Darrel hit
an area that I’ve seen more and more in books I’ve read lately. He addressed it
in a clear understandable way. That brings me to another area that has begun to
bother me a great deal as I read.
Since I became aware of Deep POV
and read Jill Nelson’s book on the subject, I’ve learned to look for those “weasel”
words of shallow POV. Her book helped me develop a workshop on the subject and
I presented it to the Tulsa WIN chapter of ACFW as well as at the TCWC in
August. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I’ve read enough to recognize deep
POV in a manuscript.
Deep POV takes away the telling
and shows us the characters thoughts and actions. By stating simple facts
without adding the words, “she knew”, “he wondered”, “she thought”, or “he felt”
to the sentence, we stay in the character’s head without telling. If you are in
one character’s POV, then everything that happens in that scene is from that
character’s observations, thoughts, and actions.
Example: After all that had happened earlier in the morning, Sally
knew her mother would be upset. She squeezed her mother’s hand. “We have to
pray even harder now.”
Revised: After all that had happened earlier in the morning, Mom
had a right to be upset. Sally squeezed her mother’s hand. “We have to pray
even harder now.”
The second sentence shows us what
Sally is feeling and thinking without telling us she knows something. Think
about our own thoughts. Do we think, “I feel so happy” or do we think simply, “I’m
so happy”?
Sometimes we often let using the
five senses become telling sentences instead of showing the reader.
Example: She offered him a plate of sugar cookies, and he grabbed
one from the plate. The taste of cinnamon made him remember the days his mother
made him sugar cookies and served them with a glass of milk after school.
Revised: She offered him a
plate of sugar cookies, and he grabbed one from the plate. One bite of the
crunchy cinnamon sugar combination returned him to childhood and after school
snacks of Snickerdoodles and milk in his mother’s kitchen.
Both sentences are correct, but
the second one not only gives a little more information, but it also shows the taste of
the cookie in a way that the reader wants one of the cookies or may have a
memory of such a cookie him or herself.
These are just little things, but
they are what I’ve learned through so many workshops at conferences and on-line
as well as from books. We’re never too old to learn. At age 76, I’m still
learning this craft of writing. I’ll never be perfect at it, but I will keep
improving until I can no longer sit at a keyboard or hold a pencil or see a
monitor or until the Lord calls me home.
Yes, it’s true that a great story
trumps poor writing skills, but learning the skills to go along with a great
story is the icing on the cake. Learning about deep POV has become one of those
little “serendipity” things, and I love writing even more after it.
What is something you learned
that either has made or will make a difference in your writing?
1 comment:
Good post, Martha. Really understanding deep POV takes a lot of time and effort, but it's worth it by producing a story that pulls the reader straight into the character.
Post a Comment